<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can C++ Style comments replace C-Style comments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weseetips.com/2008/04/05/can-c-sytle-comments-replace-c-style-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weseetips.com/2008/04/05/can-c-sytle-comments-replace-c-style-comments/</link>
	<description>Gold mine of Visual C++ tricks!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:10:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jijo.Raj</title>
		<link>http://weseetips.com/2008/04/05/can-c-sytle-comments-replace-c-style-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Jijo.Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weseetips.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I think that // is not just a replacement for /* */ in order to remove the ending */. CStyle comments have more potential issues such as nested comments which often bite us. Refer Effective C++ for detailed description about why // is recommenced to use.

Best C++ coding practices( as I said, Effective C++ ) which floats around us do discourage using CStyle comments. Because they have some drawbacks. Thats why C++ introduced new commenting style. Reading those, an average guy feels that C++ style comment is the best because its more safer. But, this article just points out that everything does have an Achilles heel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that // is not just a replacement for /* */ in order to remove the ending */. CStyle comments have more potential issues such as nested comments which often bite us. Refer Effective C++ for detailed description about why // is recommenced to use.</p>
<p>Best C++ coding practices( as I said, Effective C++ ) which floats around us do discourage using CStyle comments. Because they have some drawbacks. Thats why C++ introduced new commenting style. Reading those, an average guy feels that C++ style comment is the best because its more safer. But, this article just points out that everything does have an Achilles heel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nishad S</title>
		<link>http://weseetips.com/2008/04/05/can-c-sytle-comments-replace-c-style-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Nishad S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weseetips.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I am little bit confused that C++ is discouraging the old C style comments. Ofcourse C style comment has some problems, but I think that C++ has only introduced a simple single line comment in the form of &quot;//&quot; rather than a &quot;/* .... */&quot;.
Am I right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am little bit confused that C++ is discouraging the old C style comments. Ofcourse C style comment has some problems, but I think that C++ has only introduced a simple single line comment in the form of &#8220;//&#8221; rather than a &#8220;/* &#8230;. */&#8221;.<br />
Am I right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

